Photo Interpretation and Remote Sensing: Lab 4
Feature #1: Large water bodies
- Upon analysis in the ERDAS Imagine histogram, the most prominent features of the landscape in question are a series of large rivers and offset streams dividing the terrain. Band 4 is the ideal layer for identifying contrast between land and water, and in this particular image there is a spike between pixel values 12-18 over water that is not present on land. Below is attached a picture of the layout (Fig.1) in True Color which clearly shows the distinction between the "dark" water body compared to the surrounding land.
![]() |
Fig.1- Feature 1: Layout- True Color |
- Also shown is the Layer 4 histogram (Fig.2) for the water feature, with pixel values spiking at 12-18, and the complete spectrum of pixels throughout the layer profile. (Fig.3)
![]() |
Fig.2- Feature 1: Layer 4 Histogram |
![]() |
Fig.3- Feature 1: Complete layer pixel profile |
![]() |
Fig.4- Feature 2: Layout- False Color |
Feature #2: Clear-Cut Forest
- The following feature displays a small spike in layers 1-4 around pixel value 200 and a large spike between pixel values 9 and 11 in Layer_5 and Layer_6.
- The histograms below exemplify the aforementioned respectively in layer 3 and 5. Clear-cut forests uphold all the specified criteria throughout layers 1,2,4,and 6 as well. (Figs. 5&6). Layers 1-4 look very similar, and so do 5 and 6.
- Figure 7 shows the comparative pixel values throughout layers for Forested vs. De-forested land.
- The band combination used to clearly isolate clear-cut patches of forest was Red 6, Blue 3, Green 4- commonly known as False Color/Vegetative analysis. The forested area appears as bright green and the clear cut regions of bare soil appear vivid pink or magenta.
![]() |
Fig.5- Feature 2: Layer 3 Histogram |
![]() |
Fig.6- Feature 2: Layer 6 Histogram |
![]() |
Fig.7- Feature 2: pixels in forested vs. clear cut land |
Feature #3: Heavily Sedimented Fluvial Channels
- The prompt for the final feature was to look for a water-based feature where in certain areas, layers 1-3 to become much brighter than normal, layer 4 becomes somewhat brighter, and layers 5-6 to remain unchanged. Heavily sedimented water with high turbidity, near urban developments demonstrated these characteristics.
- The band combination used was Red- 4, Blue 2, Green 3, also known as Color Infrared highlighted the turbid waters as bright turquoise against the otherwise dark blue/green water.
- Figure 9 shows a comparison of pixel values in High-turbidity vs low turbidity water.
![]() |
Fig.8- Layout: low turbidity vs. high turbidity water bodies |
![]() |
Fig.9- pixels values throughout layers in low turbidity vs. high turbidity water bodies |
Comments
Post a Comment